007 Road to A Million – Season 2 Review

007: Road To A Million’s Season 2 delivers big wins but is slowed by its own ambitions.

A good friend of mine once lambasted me for using Pitchfork’s x.x system to grade an album. He called it nonsense, hipster for the sake of it. I argued it was “a vibe that I could build upon”, he won.

So here, we do things differently: firstly, this is a space of curation, reserved for only things that we expect to be good. So…I’m implementing this system for now.

EM – Expected More

Mission underwhelming. Potential, but gadgets left unused and exits sloppy.

G – Good

Mission completed. No surprises, no disasters. Solid, reliable. James would nod politely.

VG – Very Good

Mission memorable. Smooth, sharp, some flair in execution.

M – Masterclass

Mission flawless. Charming and artful, results undeniable. M-approved.


007: Road To A Million’s Season 2 delivers big wins but is slowed by its own ambitions.

Its goal? To offer Bond fans something to hold them over while they wait for the next Amazon-produced film.

The concern is that this show served casuals and non-fans very well, much to the chagrin of the smaller core fan base.

For me, it represents the one piece of Bond media my partner will watch without eyeing the exit. For her, it’s the one reality show I don’t reflexively sneer at. Shows like this are the connective tissue that let us bring our partners into Bond, a Trojan horse in Midnight Blue.

Two glasses of champagne sit on a table in front of a television screen displaying a nighttime cityscape of London.

Season 1 was criticized for omitting 007. I don’t think that assertion was true, and your opinion on it will dictate how highly you rate its sophomore outing. My partner and I found Season 1 struck the right tone and navigated the shark-infested waters well.

Season 2 goes in a distinctly different direction: fan service. Sometimes at the expense of casuals. This split improved as the series went on, with strong challenges and locations.

Irritating couples? More irritating. The editing leaned hard on controversy particularly with two on-trend sisters and a couple called Rob and Alex. Like Star Wars, I worry that a few diehards may have too much control over what the masses are meant to enjoy. Look no further than the comments sections of every season 2 review: complaints of “woke” and “cash grab” abound. A new show not ranking in Amazon’s top 10 isn’t there for the diehards. There just aren’t enough of us. We (while fractured) don’t represent wider society.

Two men standing back to back on a path in a lush green landscape, with a dam visible in the background.
Rob + Alex from Season 2

The contestants are similar to last season, though we spend less intimate time getting to know them until the later episodes. Most are delightful, but none captured us quite like the Bone Bros. The missions hit iconic locations and the fan service is obvious, but my wife said it pulled her out of it. She’s happy to step into the Bond world but looks for subtlety.

The elephant in the room: the show had a clear villain. It wasn’t Control or his Moneypenny stand-in, it was Alex. Some call him funny and a hoot. We respectfully disagree. He single-handedly dropped the show from Very Good to Good for me. To quote Eminem poorly: You need a little controversy… or it feels empty.  As such, the editing leans heavily on controversy, showing couple squabbles and team bickering while shoehorning Control into curious places. Though, I’ll never complain about too much Brian Cox.

A character with gray hair and a beard sits at a desk, looking serious, with a microphone and a dagger on the table, suggesting a tense meeting or discussion.
Brian Cox as Control – Credit Sky

The final episodes redeem the series, sparking the debate between us over Very Good vs Good. By “debate,” I mean me trying to extract a letter grade from the Mrs., who really had no interest in evaluating the program that way. The Casino scenes and the “luck” element of the show were true highlights and nearly tipped the scales.

Season 1 was a major win for me, bordering on Masterclass. I may be in the minority of hardcore Bond fans, but multiple non-fans in my life have been waiting for this new season with bated breath.

On Season 2…The verdict? Good, close to Very Good, and with tweaks it could have easily been Masterclass. The Bond connections were solid, but the show sometimes felt a bit Hollywood. Some of the camerawork felt staged, less natural. The fourth wall device also jarred at times. Season 1 captured relatable, tender moments; Season 2 struggled here until the final few episodes.

Still, the final mission delivered. The right two pairs made it through, with drama, high stakes, and emotion intact. This was the true triumph, and we got time to celebrate the final two. Stick it out to the end.

It must have been Good, because I bought more Bond memorabilia for the bookshelf because of it. Mexico City, anyone?

A decorative snow globe featuring a skeleton character wearing a top hat and holding a cigarette, sitting on a base adorned with skulls.
A decorative bulldog figurine with a Union Jack design sits on a stack of books, including 'Antifragile' by Nicholas Taleb and 'Steve Jobs' by Walter Isaacson. A lit candle in an ornate holder is also visible beside the books.

Newsletter

The Sunday Brief

An American in Wales, writing about the most British world in fiction. Essays on the James Bond books, the films and the drinks within them.

Discover more from T2LA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading